How Do Brain Rhythms Support Cognition?

Post by Shireen Parimoo

What Are Brain Rhythms?

The brain is never silent. Across the brain, hundreds of millions of neurons are firing at any given moment. While any individual neuron can be firing (‘on’ state) or silent (‘off’ state), populations of neurons collectively generate a rhythmic pattern of electrical activity known as neural oscillations. Most neurons in a given population alternate between the on and off states in a synchronized and rhythmic manner.

Brain rhythms were first discovered by Hans Berger in 1924, who invented electroencephalography (EEG) by placing metal electrodes on the scalp and amplifying the recorded electrical signal. When the participants’ eyes were closed, Berger noticed a dominant pattern of brain waves oscillating in the 7.5-12 Hz frequency range that are now known as the “alpha” rhythm. Interestingly, as soon as participants opened their eyes, the alpha rhythm became suppressed and was replaced by the higher frequency “beta” rhythms (12 - 30 Hz). Alpha suppression also occurred when participants engaged in mental tasks, leading Berger to speculate that alpha rhythms represent the resting brain while higher frequency rhythms are important for active cognitive processing. Berger went on to study brain rhythms in different populations, making important discoveries about their role in cognitive processes and conditions like epilepsy, but it took several years before his work gained widespread attention in the scientific community.

Studying Brain Rhythms 

Today, the study of brain rhythms and their role in cognitive processes is an active area of research. While EEG is used to non-invasively record electrical signals from the scalp, more invasive methods such as electrocorticography are also used to directly measure activity from the brain regions of interest, usually in patients undergoing brain surgery. Similarly, magnetoencephalography is used to record the magnetic fields arising from the electrical currents produced by the populations of neurons in the brain. Structural brain imaging such as MRI is often used together with EEG to localize the source of electrical signals recorded from the scalp within the brain. 

Recordings of brain rhythms look primarily like sine waves of different sizes (and sometimes, different shapes). There are three key properties of neural oscillations: 

1.    Phase: the position or angle of an oscillation. This can be the peak (top of the wave), trough (the bottom of the wave), or the rising or falling phase of the wave.

2.    Power: the amplitude or size of an oscillation.

3.    Frequency: the number of oscillations per second, usually represented in Hertz. 

It is also possible to study the interactions between brain rhythms, either within a single region or between brain regions, as a form of functional connectivity. The interaction between oscillations of different frequencies is typically investigated through cross-frequency coupling analyses. This includes: 

1.    Phase-amplitude coupling: the phase of a slower oscillation is coupled or synchronized with the amplitude of a higher-frequency oscillation. The idea is that the higher frequency oscillations represent information content, while the slower frequency oscillations control the flow of information between brain regions by influencing the amplitude of those high-frequency oscillations. 

2.    Phase-phase coupling or phase synchronization: the synchrony or alignment between the phases of brain rhythms, which can occur within the same frequency band or across different frequency bands:

a.    Cross-frequency phase synchronization: the higher-frequency oscillations begin at the same phase as the slower, lower-frequency oscillation. As with phase-amplitude coupling, phase-phase coupling is thought to be important for information transfer and neural plasticity.

b.    Inter-regional phase synchronization: phase alignment within the same frequency band across different brain regions provides a measure of communication between different brain regions. For example, the peaks and troughs of alpha rhythms in two phase-synchronized regions would typically occur with a small but consistent time lag.

The Role of Brain Rhythms in Cognition 

Our understanding of the functional significance of brain rhythms has come a long way since Berger discovered them a century ago. Now, brain rhythms are generally divided into five primary frequency bands, each of which has been associated with a distinct set of cognitive processes, some of which are described below. Note that the functions of different brain rhythms depend not only on their properties such as frequency, but also on the interactions between different frequency bands and the brain regions where they are observed.

Delta (1 – 4 Hz). Delta rhythms are lowest frequency oscillations and are most commonly linked to brain activity during deep or ‘slow wave’ sleep. However, delta rhythms are also important for internally directed attention, as delta power increases when people are concentrating on a mental task or meditating. Phase-amplitude coupling between delta and beta oscillations in prefrontal regions is also important for working memory, suggesting that delta rhythms may play a role in blocking interference from irrelevant sources while maintaining a ‘train of thought’. Other cognitive functions associated with delta rhythms include arousal, emotional and motivational processing, and memory consolidation during slow-wave sleep. 

Theta (4 – 7.5 Hz). Theta oscillations, which are slightly faster than delta rhythms, are also known as “hippocampal rhythms” and are heavily linked to memory-related processes and spatial navigation. The hippocampus is a key structure in the medial temporal lobe that is involved in the formation and retrieval of memories. Early animal studies recorded theta rhythms in the rat hippocampus and found that neuronal spiking activity during specific phases of the theta oscillation was crucial for forming new memories. In humans, the power of theta rhythms in the hippocampus increases during memory tasks while phase synchronization between theta and gamma rhythms increases when people successfully learn new information. Similarly, theta synchronization between the hippocampus and prefrontal regions also increases during the successful formation and retrieval of memories.

Cortical theta rhythms also play a role in working memory and cognitive control (i.e., the ability to perform goal-directed actions and flexibly adapt our behavior). In the prefrontal cortex, theta rhythms coordinate the activity of other brain regions that are needed for a specific task. For example, theta phase synchronization between prefrontal areas and the visual cortex is observed during visual attention tasks. Similarly, theta rhythms in the medial prefrontal cortex are linked to error-related processing, like adjusting behavior after a mistake is made. 

Alpha (7.5 – 12 Hz). Early EEG studies indicated that the alpha rhythm reflected a brain at rest, as alpha power was suppressed when people were engaged in a task but increased when people had their eyes closed. However, research from the past several decades suggests that alpha rhythms are involved in nearly every cognitive process, including attention, memory, learning, working memory, and language, just to name a few. 

There is controversy regarding exactly what role alpha rhythms play in cognition, but one of the more prominent theories is that alpha rhythms have an inhibitory function and the power of alpha oscillations plays a role in gating the flow of information, often through phase-amplitude coupling with higher-frequency gamma rhythms. Alpha activity leads to brief periods of inhibition on the neuronal population through inhibitory interneurons. Slower rhythms like alpha and theta create ‘optimal’ windows of time during which bursts of high-frequency activity can take place. When alpha power is high, those windows are short because of the inhibitory period that follows. When alpha power decreases, however, the window of time is lengthened, making neuronal firing more likely to occur.

Support for the inhibitory role of alpha rhythms comes from visual attention studies. Visual information that we see on the left side of a computer screen is processed by the visual cortex in the right hemisphere, and vice versa. Many studies have shown that when people see images on the left side of the screen, alpha power in the right visual cortex (where the image is processed) decreases, indicating a release from inhibition. Similarly, if we are told to pay attention to an image on the left side but to ignore the image on the right side of a screen, alpha power in the right hemisphere (where the attended image is processed) decreases but alpha power in the left hemisphere (where the ignored image would be processed) increases. Moreover, people typically do not remember the to-be-ignored images, suggesting that the increased alpha power inhibits the processing of those images by the left visual cortex.

Beta (12 – 30 Hz). Beta rhythms in the sensorimotor cortex were initially associated with motor control tasks, as beta power decreases while people perform a movement. Later work showed that beta power is also influenced by attentional processes before executing movements. More recently, beta rhythms have been linked to cognitive control, working memory, and decision-making. For example, there are bursts of beta activity in the prefrontal cortex during the maintenance of information in working memory. Beta power increases are also observed when people are asked to suppress information in their minds, pointing to an inhibitory role in cognitive processing, much like the alpha rhythm. In fact, alpha and beta power often decrease together during certain attentional tasks, though the inhibitory function of alpha rhythms is generally directed toward external sources of distraction whereas the inhibitory function of beta rhythms seems to be more internally directed.

Gamma (30 Hz and higher). Gamma rhythms are fast, high-frequency oscillations that are thought to represent sensory and perceptual information, making them important for higher-order cognitive functions like attention, memory, and cognitive control. Unlike slower frequency oscillations, gamma rhythms are generally observed regionally or locally. In the visual cortex, for instance, gamma power increases when people are shown images compared to when they are staring at a blank screen. Gamma rhythms are involved in a range of cognitive functions through their coupling with slower brain rhythms. This is because gamma activity occurs in bursts and is often dependent on the phase of slower oscillations like alpha that create windows of inhibition, making it less likely for the neuronal population to fire. For instance, cross-frequency coupling often occurs between alpha and gamma rhythms during the perception of sensory information like images and sounds. Here, decreases in alpha power are needed to release neurons from inhibition, and as they become more active while processing visual information, their collective firing pattern generates the gamma rhythm. Thus, regional gamma rhythms are often modulated by slower oscillations to support perceptual and cognitive processing. 

In summary, the study of brain rhythms has come a long way since the invention of EEG. By characterizing the properties of neural oscillations and their interactions across time and brain regions, we have gained valuable insight into how brain rhythms support a range of cognitive functions. Further research is still needed to fully understand how the dynamics of neural oscillations across brain networks give rise to cognitive states.   

References +

Kaplan, R. M. (2011). The mind reader: the forgotten life of Hans Berger, discoverer of the EEG. Australasian Psychiatry. Access the original scientific publication here.

Karakas, S. (2020). A review of theta oscillation and its functional correlates. International Journal of Psychophysiology. Access the original scientific publication here.

Scholes, S. et al. (2020). Modulation of slow-wave sleep: Implications for psychiatry. Current Psychiatry Reports. Access the original scientific publication here.

Harmony, T. (2013). The functional significance of delta oscillations in cognitive processing. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience. Access the original scientific publication here.

Güntekin, B. & Basar, E. (2016). Review of evoked and event-related delta responses in the human brain. Internal Journal of Psychophysiology. Access the original scientific publication here.

Quigley, C. (2022). Forgotten rhythms? Revisiting the first evidence for rhythms in cognition. European Journal of Neuroscience. Access the original scientific publication here.

Donoghue, T. et al. (2022). Methodological considerations for studying neural oscillations. European Journal of Neuroscience. Access the original scientific publication here.

Fell, J. & Axmacher, N. (2011). The role of phase synchronization in memory processes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. Access the original scientific publication here.

Belluscio, M. A. et al. (2012). Cross-frequency phase-phase coupling between theta and gamma oscillations in the hippocampus. Access the original scientific publication here.

Darvas, F. et al. (2009). Nonlinear phase-phase cross-frequency coupling mediates communication between distant sites in human neocortex. Access the original scientific publication here.

Cavanaugh, J. F. & Frank, M. J. (2014). Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Science. Access the original scientific publication here.

Eisma, J. et al. (2021). Frontal midline theta differentiates separate cognitive control strategies while still generalizing the need for cognitive control. Scientific Reports. Access the original scientific publication here.

Herweg, N. A. et al. (2020). Theta oscillations in human memory. Trends in Cognitive Science. Access the original scientific publication here.

Klimesch, W. (2012). Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information. Trends in Cognitive Science. Access the original scientific publication here.

Jensen, O. & Mazaheri, A. (2010). Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: Gating by inhibition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Access the original scientific publication here.

Worden, M. S. et al. (2000). Anticipatory biasing of visuospatial attention indexed by retinotopically specific alpha-band electroencephalography increases over occipital cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. Access the original scientific publication here.

Kilavik, B. E. et al. (2013). The ups and downs of beta oscillations in sensorimotor cortex. Experimental Neurology. Access the original scientific publication here.

Spitzer, B. & Haegens, S. (2017). Beyond the status quo: A role for beta oscillations in endogenous content (re)activation. eNeuro. Access the original scientific publication here.